Results from Survey for Prosthetists for Senior Design Project
Cara Negri
Description
Collection
Title:
Results from Survey for Prosthetists for Senior Design Project
Creator:
Cara Negri
Date:
4/10/2014
Text:
Thank you to the 95 participants in the survey for Prosthetists
regarding design
of products in our industry for a senior design project. The results for
part 2 were as followed.
3) Please rank in order the areas that your patients report transtibial
socket discomfort from most common to least common
a) Fibular head- #1- 17.89%, #2- 44.21%, #3- 26.32%, #4- 7.37%, #5- 3.16%,
#6- 1.05%. Average Ranking for fibular head- 4.63
b) Distal Tibia- #1- 69.15%, #2- 21.28%, #3- 8.51%, #4- 0.00%, #5- 1.06%,
#6- 0.00%.
Average Ranking for Distal Tibia- 5.57
c) Tibial Tubercle- #1- 1.05%, #2- 1.05%, #3- 13.68%, #4- 22.11%, #5-
31.58%- #6- 30.53%. Average Ranking for Tibial Tubercle- 2.26
d) Medial Condyle- #1- 1.05%, #2- 3.16%, #3- 25.26%, #4- 28.42%, #5-
23.16%. #6- 18.95%. Average Ranking for Medial Condyle- 2.74
e) Anterior Tibia- #1- 1.58%, #2- 28.42%, #3- 15.79%, #4- 21.05%, #5-
15.79%, #6- 7.37%.
Average Ranking for Anterior Tibia- 3.77
f) Distal Fibula- #1- 0.00%, #2- 2.11%, #3- 10.53%, #4- 21.05%, #5- 25.26%,
#6- 41.05%
Average Ranking for Distal Fibula- 2.07
4) If a transtibial interface could reduce the amount of socket
replacements, and/ or adjustments needed to keep the patient comfortable
and mobile, the price should be
a) $300-$400- 23.16%
b) $400-$500- 12.63%
c) $500-$600- 11.58%
d) More than $600- 23.16%
e) Other (please specify)- 29.47%
If Other was chosen, the respondent was asked for additional comments. The
responses were as follows:
- Only a free market can answer this. All else is speculation.
- not sure
- reduce is non-specific, significant reduction would be worth $600
- cost or billing price?
- Cheap, we are getting killed on reimbursement as it is. But won't R&D,
fabrication costs, profit margin etc. determine this
- The cost wouldn't matter, as long as we can get paid (and hopefully make
a profit) for the magic interface.
- It would depend on recieving a code. VASS versus pin/lock
- the price to whom?
- no cporrelation
- if it doesn't require frequent replacing or if it is intrinsic to the
socket it will probably be more expensive (500-2000). However, if it is
easily replacable or requires multiples, it will be less expensive
(50-500). The cost of the item should be relative to its form, function and
manufacturing expense.; ideally, the interface will be simple to use and
cost effective for both patient AND prosthetist!
- covered by medicare. (about $400-500)
- this is not in my scope practice
- whatever is needed
- no opinion
- Lower than 300 - 400
- Interfaces already cost much more than these sums
- What price? Material, fab,Medicare fee?
- improper way to price
- $200-300
- Depends how long it takes to make it and the material costs
- < $200
- undeterminable
- N/A
- Appopriate to the fabrication costs and labor to fit it.
- determined per the cost of material and fabrication
- The actual cost of the material
- check Otto Bock PUR liner/already has build ups
If you have any questions regarding the survey, please feel free to contact
me.
Best regards,
Cara Negri, CP
<Email Address Redacted>
--
*P** P**lease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*
regarding design
of products in our industry for a senior design project. The results for
part 2 were as followed.
3) Please rank in order the areas that your patients report transtibial
socket discomfort from most common to least common
a) Fibular head- #1- 17.89%, #2- 44.21%, #3- 26.32%, #4- 7.37%, #5- 3.16%,
#6- 1.05%. Average Ranking for fibular head- 4.63
b) Distal Tibia- #1- 69.15%, #2- 21.28%, #3- 8.51%, #4- 0.00%, #5- 1.06%,
#6- 0.00%.
Average Ranking for Distal Tibia- 5.57
c) Tibial Tubercle- #1- 1.05%, #2- 1.05%, #3- 13.68%, #4- 22.11%, #5-
31.58%- #6- 30.53%. Average Ranking for Tibial Tubercle- 2.26
d) Medial Condyle- #1- 1.05%, #2- 3.16%, #3- 25.26%, #4- 28.42%, #5-
23.16%. #6- 18.95%. Average Ranking for Medial Condyle- 2.74
e) Anterior Tibia- #1- 1.58%, #2- 28.42%, #3- 15.79%, #4- 21.05%, #5-
15.79%, #6- 7.37%.
Average Ranking for Anterior Tibia- 3.77
f) Distal Fibula- #1- 0.00%, #2- 2.11%, #3- 10.53%, #4- 21.05%, #5- 25.26%,
#6- 41.05%
Average Ranking for Distal Fibula- 2.07
4) If a transtibial interface could reduce the amount of socket
replacements, and/ or adjustments needed to keep the patient comfortable
and mobile, the price should be
a) $300-$400- 23.16%
b) $400-$500- 12.63%
c) $500-$600- 11.58%
d) More than $600- 23.16%
e) Other (please specify)- 29.47%
If Other was chosen, the respondent was asked for additional comments. The
responses were as follows:
- Only a free market can answer this. All else is speculation.
- not sure
- reduce is non-specific, significant reduction would be worth $600
- cost or billing price?
- Cheap, we are getting killed on reimbursement as it is. But won't R&D,
fabrication costs, profit margin etc. determine this
- The cost wouldn't matter, as long as we can get paid (and hopefully make
a profit) for the magic interface.
- It would depend on recieving a code. VASS versus pin/lock
- the price to whom?
- no cporrelation
- if it doesn't require frequent replacing or if it is intrinsic to the
socket it will probably be more expensive (500-2000). However, if it is
easily replacable or requires multiples, it will be less expensive
(50-500). The cost of the item should be relative to its form, function and
manufacturing expense.; ideally, the interface will be simple to use and
cost effective for both patient AND prosthetist!
- covered by medicare. (about $400-500)
- this is not in my scope practice
- whatever is needed
- no opinion
- Lower than 300 - 400
- Interfaces already cost much more than these sums
- What price? Material, fab,Medicare fee?
- improper way to price
- $200-300
- Depends how long it takes to make it and the material costs
- < $200
- undeterminable
- N/A
- Appopriate to the fabrication costs and labor to fit it.
- determined per the cost of material and fabrication
- The actual cost of the material
- check Otto Bock PUR liner/already has build ups
If you have any questions regarding the survey, please feel free to contact
me.
Best regards,
Cara Negri, CP
<Email Address Redacted>
--
*P** P**lease consider the environment before printing this e-mail.*
Citation
Cara Negri, “Results from Survey for Prosthetists for Senior Design Project,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 6, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/236314.