Re: Rantings on Licensure

Tony Barr

Description

Title:

Re: Rantings on Licensure

Creator:

Tony Barr

Date:

4/13/2006

Text:

I talked about Licensure- they did not care. Unless it would affect that
THEY would not be able to bill directly for that Bledsoe their PT put on a
patient they did not care.Getting licensure is truly not enough.

Forwarded On behalf and with his permission , Richard Kaderli amputee
Ukiah, CA writes:

Tony, et al.,

I can look at this somewhat objectively. I had my first shock as an amputee
when I found out that prosthetists weren't train in medical practices at all
yet were fitting medical devices onto my body in a medical type setting. I
can not see how a medical biller or medical assistant needs more medical
background training than an unlicensed prosthetist. I am not buying
furniture when I get a wooden leg (figure of speech), why would I go to
tinker?

But as an educator, I have seen how politics and regulatory commissions turn
the road paved with good intentions into a funding source and eventually
goldmine (or at least a position of consultancy and big fees).

 It is a shame that what is essentially a socialist ideal--equal public
education or equal quality provided health care, should be spun on a
capitalistic business model. These disparate concerns should not be
unleashed on the amputee who may well be in a newly disabled and vulnerable
position. So in light of who is the most vulnerable, I say let's error in
favor of that side and regulate and license the O&P, warranted or not.

                          

Citation

Tony Barr, “Re: Rantings on Licensure,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 2, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/226685.