[Fwd: Cross Posting / Private Discussion / Removal From List]
George Boyer
Description
Collection
Title:
[Fwd: Cross Posting / Private Discussion / Removal From List]
Creator:
George Boyer
Date:
12/22/1999
Text:
George Boyer wrote:
> Dear Wayne and the lists and all - you know very well that nothing
> embarrassing about salary ever came out, NO DETAILS AT ALL. I was not
> responding to ANYTHING which could be the least bit personally
> sensitive.....give me the credit for knowing and caring about that
> difference. AND I do honestly have the impression that cross posting has
> been routine and which fogged your meticulousness for me. People getting
> bent out of shape over this seems to me to be too similar to the effort of
> some here to put out of business any and all general inquiry and comment re
> O. and P. matters where policy and philosophy are involved. (Take heed:
> there is NO other forum for this exchange which certainly is as important
> as are case details.)
>
> I repeat: nothing sensitive about salary was mentioned. Where is the
> substance here....that I, George Boyer, posted oblique philosophical
> material over Bill's specific and direct inquiry?? Are not the objections
> therefore pro forma?? Or, more telling, additional barbs in the ongoing
> series directed at my evaluative approach?? GB.
>
> <Email Address Redacted> wrote:
>
> > One day George Boyer philosophized:
> Dear Wayne and the lists and all - you know very well that nothing
> embarrassing about salary ever came out, NO DETAILS AT ALL. I was not
> responding to ANYTHING which could be the least bit personally
> sensitive.....give me the credit for knowing and caring about that
> difference. AND I do honestly have the impression that cross posting has
> been routine and which fogged your meticulousness for me. People getting
> bent out of shape over this seems to me to be too similar to the effort of
> some here to put out of business any and all general inquiry and comment re
> O. and P. matters where policy and philosophy are involved. (Take heed:
> there is NO other forum for this exchange which certainly is as important
> as are case details.)
>
> I repeat: nothing sensitive about salary was mentioned. Where is the
> substance here....that I, George Boyer, posted oblique philosophical
> material over Bill's specific and direct inquiry?? Are not the objections
> therefore pro forma?? Or, more telling, additional barbs in the ongoing
> series directed at my evaluative approach?? GB.
>
> <Email Address Redacted> wrote:
>
> > One day George Boyer philosophized:
Citation
George Boyer, “[Fwd: Cross Posting / Private Discussion / Removal From List],” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 22, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/213358.
