Re: [Fwd: Cross Posting / Private Discussion / Removal From List]

Re: [Fwd: Cross Posting / Private Discussion / Removal From List]

bronco

12/22/1999

I see that at times you are yelling in this message. Again,
I wonder where the interest is? Credit is given where
credit is due.
Bronco
-----------------------------------------------------
Click here for Free Video!!
<URL Redacted>

----- Original Message -----
From: George Boyer < <Email Address Redacted> >
To: < <Email Address Redacted> >
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 8:31 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Cross Posting / Private Discussion / Removal From List]


> George Boyer wrote:
>
> > Dear Wayne and the lists and all - you know very well that nothing
> > embarrassing about salary ever came out, NO DETAILS AT ALL. I was not
> > responding to ANYTHING which could be the least bit personally
> > sensitive.....give me the credit for knowing and caring about that
> > difference. AND I do honestly have the impression that cross posting
has
> > been routine and which fogged your meticulousness for me. People
getting
> > bent out of shape over this seems to me to be too similar to the effort
of
> > some here to put out of business any and all general inquiry and comment
re
> > O. and P. matters where policy and philosophy are involved. (Take heed:
> > there is NO other forum for this exchange which certainly is as
important
> > as are case details.)
> >
> > I repeat: nothing sensitive about salary was mentioned. Where is the
> > substance here....that I, George Boyer, posted oblique philosophical
> > material over Bill's specific and direct inquiry?? Are not the
objections
> > therefore pro forma?? Or, more telling, additional barbs in the ongoing
> > series directed at my evaluative approach?? GB.
> >
> > <Email Address Redacted> wrote:
> >
> > > One day George Boyer philosophized:
>
>