gunk question

chrisj

Description

Title:

gunk question

Creator:

chrisj

Date:

5/16/2012

Text:

I am wanting to know if anyone has empirical data on the strength -
weight - reliability of gunk options listed below. I use coe tray and
find it to be extremely strong and easily workable while curing. I am being
challenged by another stating seigle and sulcafloc are comparable to that
of coe tray....I disagree but would like to have more input from you'll.
(By the way if I'm wrong I am not going to admit to the other
person...kidding). Thanks in advance.

1. Seiglehartz and sulcafloc

2.
Seiglehartz and micro balloons

3. Coe tray plastic (methyl methacrylate)


--
Christopher Jones, CPO

Rebound Prosthetics, Inc.
1664 Lafayette
St
Denver, CO 80218
Phone: 303.832.7287
Fax:
303.830.0327

___________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This
e-mail message, and any attachments, is a confidential business
communication

that may contain proprietary information, and is intended
for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) named above.

If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for
delivering it to the intended

recipient, be aware that you have received
this document in error and that any discussion, review, dissemination,


distribution, or copying of this message may be prohibited by or
actionable under law. If you have received this

communication in error,
please discard any copies and notify me at <Email Address Redacted>


                          

Citation

chrisj, “gunk question,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 1, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/233636.