elevated vacuum response

Jon Batzdorff

Description

Title:

elevated vacuum response

Creator:

Jon Batzdorff

Date:

10/20/2009

Text:

I received a number of questions and responses to my previous post in which
I commented on lowering the trim lines in an elevated vacuum socket. I was
asked what I meant specifically when I said that with elevated vacuum the
fit must be dead on.

 

I am posting a copy of one of the questions and my reply to it below:

 

If there are more questions fire away,

 

Jon Batzdorff, CPO

 

 

 

 

Good Morning Jon,

 

I'm watching with interest the increase in popularity of the elevated vacuum

systems, having first cut my teeth with the OWW system. I'm curious about

your final statement relative to the 'dead-on' socket fit given that the

trim lines are inferior to the pelvic anatomy. Short of tension values, and

having no anatomical construct to the femur/soft tissue matrix distally, how

do you define this 'dead-on' concept. To date it appears more of a

reflection of the vacuum containment/strength and residual muscular

integrity. Just thought I'd ask you personally. Thanks.

 

-----------------------------

 

Hi David,

 

The dead on has to do with several things. Here are the primary elements.

 

1. Liner fit: It is my feeling that most of the problems associated with

milking and distal edema with lanyard and pin fit transfemoral liners is

because they are off the shelf liners. Therefore the tension

they apply to the soft issue is uneven and random unless you

happen to have either a residual limb that perfectly matches

the conical liners. You can imagine how most of them re-shape the soft
tissue

to fit the liner, rather than the other way around. The reason there are not

even more problems than we see is because they are typically not suction

sockets. If you take a non-custom liner and apply suction, the possibilities

for problems increase and if you increase the vacuum to 27 inches, you are

creating a dangerous system, depending on the fit of the liner. Therefore, I
recommend that you pay particular

attention to the fit of the liner and either make a habit of using custom

liners on elevated vacuum as I do religiously, or be darn sure the ordered

liner fits with even tensions throughout the limb.

 

2. The fit at the distal one half of the socket and distal end: If you are

using a double walled socket, which I recommend for transfemoral elevated

vacuum, you cannot visually see the distal fit of the socket. There is a

liner and then a wick which is a cotton sock, and a vacuum cap made of

carbon. Even if you made a clear test socket initially,

there are so many layers of things that it is hard to get an accurate

eyeball view of the fit down there. The vacuum cap must be cast, modified

and constructed to provide total contact with some compression both

circumferentially and distally, and the patient must be trained in applying

the liner, wick, the distal end cap, and the outer socket properly to

assure proper fit.

 

I hope this helps specify the concerns. As I begin the next elevated vacuum

socket next week I will try to post each step of the process on the blog

as I am doing the steps of the process. So check that out for

more details: <URL Redacted>

 

 

Jon

 


                          

Citation

Jon Batzdorff, “elevated vacuum response,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 5, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/230810.