Automated Foot Scanners vs Traditional Methods
Miki Fairley
Description
Collection
Title:
Automated Foot Scanners vs Traditional Methods
Creator:
Miki Fairley
Date:
8/23/2004
Text:
Hello, everyone. The O&P EDGE is planning an article on automated foot
scanning technology, and we are interested in experiences and comments
from independent users.
Do you currently-or have you in the past-used an automated foot scanner?
If so, how do you feel it compares with more conventional methods?
For more traditional methods, do you prefer slipper casting, foam
impressions, or others?
Please e-mail Miki Fairley: <Email Address Redacted> or phone me at
970.731.2897.
Thanks for your help. We look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Miki Fairley
Editor
The O&P Edge
Western Media LLC
Phone: 970.731.2897; fax: 970.731.9366
scanning technology, and we are interested in experiences and comments
from independent users.
Do you currently-or have you in the past-used an automated foot scanner?
If so, how do you feel it compares with more conventional methods?
For more traditional methods, do you prefer slipper casting, foam
impressions, or others?
Please e-mail Miki Fairley: <Email Address Redacted> or phone me at
970.731.2897.
Thanks for your help. We look forward to hearing from you.
Regards,
Miki Fairley
Editor
The O&P Edge
Western Media LLC
Phone: 970.731.2897; fax: 970.731.9366
Citation
Miki Fairley, “Automated Foot Scanners vs Traditional Methods,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 6, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/223458.
