State Licensee designations Update-still need response from Washington State!
Tony Barr
Description
Collection
Title:
State Licensee designations Update-still need response from Washington State!
Creator:
Tony Barr
Date:
10/4/2001
Text:
Many of you have asked for results! See below!
I am updating our list of of some 100 Sponsoring Prosthetists for the Barr
Foundation and would like to know if the currently five licensed states are
legally allowed now to use the approiate state licensed credential
designations of LP, LO or LPO next to their names.
Florida -LP, LO, LPO
Texas-LP, LO, LPO
Ohio-LP, LO, LPO
Washington-?
Illinois- for now, just LO, LP
Oklahoma- has registration law-no regulation or licensee designation
Hey Washington State practitioners,can you use these designations with your
regulation?
Please reply to <Email Address Redacted>
Thank you
Tony Barr
Barr Foundation
www.oandp.com/barr
I am updating our list of of some 100 Sponsoring Prosthetists for the Barr
Foundation and would like to know if the currently five licensed states are
legally allowed now to use the approiate state licensed credential
designations of LP, LO or LPO next to their names.
Florida -LP, LO, LPO
Texas-LP, LO, LPO
Ohio-LP, LO, LPO
Washington-?
Illinois- for now, just LO, LP
Oklahoma- has registration law-no regulation or licensee designation
Hey Washington State practitioners,can you use these designations with your
regulation?
Please reply to <Email Address Redacted>
Thank you
Tony Barr
Barr Foundation
www.oandp.com/barr
Citation
Tony Barr, “State Licensee designations Update-still need response from Washington State!,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 29, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/217607.