Mysterious CPO1 and 90 degree posterior stop
Description
Collection
Title:
Mysterious CPO1 and 90 degree posterior stop
Text:
Hi again folks.
I hit the send button prior to getting my name attached. Sorry. As they
say, it takes two atta-boys to cover up an Oh _ _ _ _, so I guess I need a
few atta-boys, once again. The story of my life. Anyway, I have received
several replies to my post from last night and will eventually reply to each
and every one privately. It will take more than one evening though to
complete the task. When finished, I will post a summary of the ordeal,
without mention of any person. For what it is worth, question 1 and 2 were
related. Question 3 had nothing to do with question 1 and 2. I should have
added question 3 later. The purpose of question 3 was simply to raise the
issue of whether or not a solid anterior shell is required to induce
effective floor reaction forces. My opinions about this will follow in an
eventual summary. In the meantime, I do value all replies, including the
ones that label me as an incompetent _ _ _ hole. I have felt that way on
many an occasion and it is refreshing to get some outside support.
The sole purpose of this excercise is to encourage and share constructive
thinking and problem solving for O&P issues. When finished, I believe I will
have learned something. Whether or not anyone else does remains to be seen.
Your friend,
Wil Haines, CPO
I hit the send button prior to getting my name attached. Sorry. As they
say, it takes two atta-boys to cover up an Oh _ _ _ _, so I guess I need a
few atta-boys, once again. The story of my life. Anyway, I have received
several replies to my post from last night and will eventually reply to each
and every one privately. It will take more than one evening though to
complete the task. When finished, I will post a summary of the ordeal,
without mention of any person. For what it is worth, question 1 and 2 were
related. Question 3 had nothing to do with question 1 and 2. I should have
added question 3 later. The purpose of question 3 was simply to raise the
issue of whether or not a solid anterior shell is required to induce
effective floor reaction forces. My opinions about this will follow in an
eventual summary. In the meantime, I do value all replies, including the
ones that label me as an incompetent _ _ _ hole. I have felt that way on
many an occasion and it is refreshing to get some outside support.
The sole purpose of this excercise is to encourage and share constructive
thinking and problem solving for O&P issues. When finished, I believe I will
have learned something. Whether or not anyone else does remains to be seen.
Your friend,
Wil Haines, CPO
Citation
“Mysterious CPO1 and 90 degree posterior stop,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 2, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/215718.