Ethics was: RE: your post(helix)
Anderson Harold R.
Description
Collection
Title:
Ethics was: RE: your post(helix)
Creator:
Anderson Harold R.
Date:
8/17/2000
Text:
Some very good points are made. Ralph also makes a good point that
substantiation of orthotic (prosthetic?) outcomes is long overdue for this
field.
If, in fact, this group has made inroads in this area, I welcome it and
would like to see it offered for peer review. If, as it appears, this group
is keeping this information to themselves so only they can benefit
financially or otherwise from it, I can only assume that the information on
the website is pure marketing.
I'm disturbed by the number of so-called professionals in our field who
decide to patent a process, concept, trimline, which should be within the
realm of what we do as orthotists (prosthetists?). We don't do anything
about it, then we complain because DOC (an outsider?) does that very thing
with the plagiocephaly helmets. I see this as being a much bigger potential
threat to our profession than Hanger. Whatever happened to individuals in
the profession researching and developing an idea - then publishing it in
our national publications? Suppose that John Glancy patented all of his
ideas or the Bidwells patented the Milwaukee Brace or whoever first got the
idea of making orthoses out of thermoplastic patented the process? I
suspect that every one of us in this profession (O&P) have designed
something unique, discovered a new technique, or even have a great idea that
we'd like to try but haven't the opportunity, yet to do so. I also
suspect (personal experience;-) that the vast majority of those ideas have
been thought of before, done before, or are being done somewhere and we just
haven't heard of it yet. We have a choice - to do nothing about the idea,
to develop the idea and share it with our peers, or to try to _directly_
profit from the idea by patenting it or keeping it secret so that everyone
else has to buy it from us. By patenting an idea or making it secret, we
are throwing walls up in our profession. But we (I assume this goes for
most on this list) live in a free society where it is legal for individuals
to patent processes and keep secrets. So we have to learn to live with it.
I don't have any great answers but I suspect that (in the US at least) the
Academy could take a stand on the issue and work to come up with ways to
encourage or entice practitioners to share ideas with their peers so that
all O&P patients/clients can benefit from great new(or renewed) innovations.
Harold Anderson, CO
> -----Original Message-----
>
> This entire subject is about O&P ethics, which has nothing to do with
> whether these people made you a good brace. (orthosis)
>
> Bob McCulloch
>
>
substantiation of orthotic (prosthetic?) outcomes is long overdue for this
field.
If, in fact, this group has made inroads in this area, I welcome it and
would like to see it offered for peer review. If, as it appears, this group
is keeping this information to themselves so only they can benefit
financially or otherwise from it, I can only assume that the information on
the website is pure marketing.
I'm disturbed by the number of so-called professionals in our field who
decide to patent a process, concept, trimline, which should be within the
realm of what we do as orthotists (prosthetists?). We don't do anything
about it, then we complain because DOC (an outsider?) does that very thing
with the plagiocephaly helmets. I see this as being a much bigger potential
threat to our profession than Hanger. Whatever happened to individuals in
the profession researching and developing an idea - then publishing it in
our national publications? Suppose that John Glancy patented all of his
ideas or the Bidwells patented the Milwaukee Brace or whoever first got the
idea of making orthoses out of thermoplastic patented the process? I
suspect that every one of us in this profession (O&P) have designed
something unique, discovered a new technique, or even have a great idea that
we'd like to try but haven't the opportunity, yet to do so. I also
suspect (personal experience;-) that the vast majority of those ideas have
been thought of before, done before, or are being done somewhere and we just
haven't heard of it yet. We have a choice - to do nothing about the idea,
to develop the idea and share it with our peers, or to try to _directly_
profit from the idea by patenting it or keeping it secret so that everyone
else has to buy it from us. By patenting an idea or making it secret, we
are throwing walls up in our profession. But we (I assume this goes for
most on this list) live in a free society where it is legal for individuals
to patent processes and keep secrets. So we have to learn to live with it.
I don't have any great answers but I suspect that (in the US at least) the
Academy could take a stand on the issue and work to come up with ways to
encourage or entice practitioners to share ideas with their peers so that
all O&P patients/clients can benefit from great new(or renewed) innovations.
Harold Anderson, CO
> -----Original Message-----
>
> This entire subject is about O&P ethics, which has nothing to do with
> whether these people made you a good brace. (orthosis)
>
> Bob McCulloch
>
>
Citation
Anderson Harold R., “Ethics was: RE: your post(helix),” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 26, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/214359.
