Re: US politics-Licensing and Reciprocity
Terry Supan
Description
Collection
Title:
Re: US politics-Licensing and Reciprocity
Creator:
Terry Supan
Date:
4/14/2000
Text:
As part of my duties as the ABC's Licensure Committee, I have been reviewing the
current laws and pending bills. Yes, most of the legislation has some type of
Reciprocity in them. Phases like equal to or greater than State requirements
are usually what determins wheither the will be reciprosity or not.
Terry Supan, CPO
<Email Address Redacted> wrote:
> Prior to becoming a prosthetist, I was an R.N
>
> I was originally licensed in California. Because of the rigorousness of the
> exam, I had reciprocity in any state i.e. I didn't have to take another test,
> just pay the fees for the state I was in at the time.
>
> Is this the same situation for P&O licensing? If not, it probably should be.
> Does anybody know?
>
>
current laws and pending bills. Yes, most of the legislation has some type of
Reciprocity in them. Phases like equal to or greater than State requirements
are usually what determins wheither the will be reciprosity or not.
Terry Supan, CPO
<Email Address Redacted> wrote:
> Prior to becoming a prosthetist, I was an R.N
>
> I was originally licensed in California. Because of the rigorousness of the
> exam, I had reciprocity in any state i.e. I didn't have to take another test,
> just pay the fees for the state I was in at the time.
>
> Is this the same situation for P&O licensing? If not, it probably should be.
> Does anybody know?
>
>
Citation
Terry Supan, “Re: US politics-Licensing and Reciprocity,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 23, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/214267.
