Re: semantics

Description

Title:

Re: semantics

Text:

Very well stated Mr. Sexton and I agree 100%. In my haste, I responded to
Kim negatively and stirred the coals so to speak. I must admit though she
certainly has a flair for bringing a topic to the forefront, and it has me
reevaluating how I refer to the people I deal with daily. Whether it be a
customer, consumer, client or referral I will continue to display the same
compassion, care and genuine concern for that person as I would for a
patient. It sounds as if Kim has had some bad experiences with practitioners
in the past and for that I am sorry, but to call us rotten as a whole is poor
judgement. I practice my profession according to a code of ethics and hope
my fellow practiitioners do the same. I have visited Kim's website and found
much of it to be both impressive and informative, and will continue to visit
and listen to the voices and needs of those we help through these forums. I
hope we can move past this issue and try and solve other problems. Any topic
suggestions, Kim?

Scott A. Boehlke

Citation

“Re: semantics,” Digital Resource Foundation for Orthotics and Prosthetics, accessed November 7, 2024, https://library.drfop.org/items/show/211878.